gLAMP Hub
  • About
  • Index
  • gLAMP Central
    • Documentation
      • Style
      • Templates
        • Element
          • Notice
            • Copy Formatted
            • Stub
            • Removal
        • Page
          • API
          • Changelog
          • FAQ
          • Guide
    • Infrastructure
      • Digital
      • Physical
  • gLAMP Consortium Review
    • Contents
      • Front
      • Body
      • Topics
      • Back
        • Glossary
        • References
          • Annotations
            • Items
            • Rubric
            • Typesetting Sample
        • Supplement
        • Web-Only Resources
    • Documentation
      • Aims
      • Basics (FAQ)
      • Content
        • Details
        • Structure
      • Editorial
        • Changelog
        • Notes To Editors
    • Feedback
      • Community Comments
      • Peer Review
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • About
  • What is the gLAMP Review?
  • When are things happening?
  • Authorship
  • What is the authorship model?
  • Who is a section lead?
  • Who is a contributor?
  • Who gets writing credit?
  • Guidelines
  • Instructions for Authors?
  • Tools for figures?
  • Can contributions be graphical abstracts?
  • More
  • Looking for old notes?
  • Looking for something else?
Export as PDF
  1. gLAMP Consortium Review
  2. Documentation

Basics (FAQ)

PreviousAimsNextContent

Last updated 3 years ago

About

What is the gLAMP Review?

See:

When are things happening?

2020 schedules were not carried over from prior docs.

Authorship

What is the authorship model?

  1. ‘Football team’ of co-authors and supporting contributors.

  2. Co-authors help to write, collate, and synthesize contributions.

  3. Sections prioritize topics of importance to the collective.

Who is a section lead?

Section Leads are corresponding authors for their respective sections.

Who is a contributor?

Volunteering Contributors write one or more elements for inclusion (½-¾ page each). We expect these contributions to be ‘close to home’ for the contributor and hence not a significant overhead to write. These can be a cliff note summary of a contributor’s presentation to a Thursday gLAMP, of a preprint, or a summary of an aspect of LAMP testing literature that they have particularly focused on.

Solicited Contributors are individuals that section leads will contact with a request for ½-¾ page on a particular topic for which we currently do not have coverage. If subsequent encouragement is needed, please let us know.

Who gets writing credit?

Everyone who contributes to the review will receive authorship credit.

Guidelines

Instructions for Authors?

For various other matters, refer to journal guides:

Tools for figures?

Biorender and any visualization tool you might require.

Can contributions be graphical abstracts?

Yes.

More

Looking for old notes?

Looking for something else?

We have everything from the duration of the gLAMP review writing period. Are you looking for something that seems to be missing? Let Jeremy and Keith know. We'll make it more visible.

​ [​ , ​]

[​ , ​]

[​​]

Early notes were collated at .

Journal of Biomolecular Techniques (JBT)
archive.org
archive.is
Current Opinion in Biotechnology (COBIOT)
archive.is
archive.org
Nature Biotechnology (NBT)
archive.is
gLAMP Review Notes
About § gLAMP Review